Friday, April 24, 2009

Secession

rappers

Time for Rhode Island to go it Alone?

Rappers responded to a question about secession; as in, should rhode island secede from the country?  The question was prompted by the emotion at last week’s ‘tea parties’.  In Texas, there were calls for secession, and even Governor Rick Perry claimed it might be warranted because the federal government has abandoned the country’s founding principles of limited government. He said the federal government is strangling Americans with taxation, spending and debt.  So how abouit little Rhody?  Here are your responses.

Bill, please make a positive questions. Seceding was settled in 1865.
WM

If RI were to leave the Union we would be in some serious trouble, I mean more than now a lot more than now.
This state can not make it on the BILLIONS the feds already send us and if we were to go away that money would also and then where would donnie and the fools on the hill be?
Of course, we the people might tell them all to take a hike, pull out our guns and have us a little cleaning house party. Just kidding here.
Anyway, seriously no, we can not afford to pull out of the Union, we would probably become the toxic waste dump for all the states who stayed in the union, I mean worse than we all ready are.
Judith Coventry

With their hands in our pockets and a system that rewards the undeserving rich, passing the risk on to our kids; it is not enough to stop paying taxes we must all take advantage of bankruptcy management and walk away from our obligations.
We don’t know what the economy will look like in the future; We do know the past is gone, the wealthy increased their share of national wealth, and taxpayers are left to pay for it.
A system of just compensation for labor and services has been destroyed and replaced by excessive financial speculation with no liability; compensated and assisted to gamble wildly, creating artificially high asset prices leaving main street to shoulder any future downside risk while they privatize the gain in asset protection. The US Congress taking orders from Wall Street and having votes bought by lobbyists, banks and Financial institutions; created a speculative bubble in the housing market, private equity futures, hedge funds, and derivatives. 
They got a guy who can’t figure out his own taxes; entrusted to fix the economy and figure out what to do with our money. Creating a program that is designed to keep asset prices artificially high while transferring the bulk of the losses to the taxpayer. It represents a massive shift of risk away from Wall Street and onto the back of the American taxpayer. 
This crisis was caused by a purposeful and massive expansion of credit, which cannot be overcome with more credit. The one month rally “the worst is behind us” that’s been going on for the past two years; while vacancy rates, job losses, and credit card delinquency are on the rise looks like “glimmers of hope” speculation to postpone the crash and buy time to spread the risk on to everybody.
Government does not have any money of its own. It only has what it takes from the rest of us. If individuals meet their obligations and try to save for retirement, but their government takes on additional debt, we are all simply running up an avalanche. 

Our Leaders have insured the commitment of our children in the Long War to “Birth the New Middle East”. They did not secure our borders and have devalued our savings and rewarded fraudulent fiscal policies. They do not represent main street as the polls show, they work for the New World Order keeping the ruled in the dark so why pay them.
Zuke

Rhode Island has had over 400 years to get it’s act together and it is
still a wanna-be state. It should be made part of Massachusetts or Connecticut.
Do nothing Governors, super high taxes, potholes, bridges falling apart,
plenty of illegals, no jobs, let’s all toast to RI with a coffee milk.
Oh yeah, it’s a great state!
stuckinri

Posted by Bill Rappleye on 04/24 at 11:22 AM
(0) CommentsPermalink

Friday, April 17, 2009

bump bumping

rappers

merit over longevity

rappers on the board with comments about the move by the new school superintendent in Providence, to assign school teachers based on merit…not the union way of seniority.  here’s an earful.

I agree with the superintendent. It has been a pet peeve of mine for many years. I would not have a plumber try to teach auto mechanics. A teacher’s expertise should be the deciding factor. Do you think this is the reason why test scores are not what they should be?
Lee L. Woonsocket

That is great news!!  It will be nice to see that MERIT will be better valued than LONGEVITY!  YAY for the superintendent, and a big BOO for the entrenched teacher’s union fighting for change that would actually benefit the system.  Common sense again….
Elaine, Glocester

Let’s see how long the School Superintendent lasts this time.
Silly people. Teachers work 180 days per year for a full years pay.
Vacations almost every other week. Summers off. $50,000 annual pay.
And you think they will give up the gravy train?
I don’t think so. Oh and start looking for a baby sitter for when they strike again.
Stuckinri

Avoiding seniority by the strictest letter of the law is a good turn of events for any organization. It brings merit to the selection of candidates for positions. The selection process has to be transparent and quantified by a remote authority.
steve, westerly

Seniority is the fairest way to determine who should get a job up for bid.  Without it we will be going back to appointments based on who we know and not how long we have served or how much experience we have earned during our tenure teaching.
Stateworka

This is yet another knife in the back for labor.  When the credibility of a contract is ignored or destroyed by such an egregious act as it is in this matter then all contracts will be devalued and rendered irrelevant over time.  When this happens everyone will suffer the consequences. 
Dennis g.

Teachers’ assignments should be based on their qualifications.  Can you imagine a physical education teacher with 20 years seniority bumping a physics teacher with less seniority?  With the current system in place, that could actually happen!  How about we do what’s best for the students for a change and not the union driven teachers!
Maria D, Cranston

We had a similar situation in Cumberland, years ago, wherein a teacher with seniority, and a dual certification, but totally incompetent in that 2nd-certification, could bump the top teacher in the system, for that subject, if she (he) wanted to teach it…. and if that teacher were of less seniority!
We finally got it out of the contract as it was just one more example of the Teacher’s Unions having their heads, and their values, ‘You Know Where’ - and concerned more their own… then the best interest of the students!
Tom L, Cumberland

Posted by Bill Rappleye on 04/17 at 12:59 PM
(1) CommentsPermalink
Page 1 of 1 pages

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement