Friday, November 21, 2008
Matthews too Much
bill rap and lthe rappers
No Longer Objective
so a lot of response to the question of whether Chris Matthews crossed the line when he said his job is to support President-elect Obama’s administration…rappers sounded off, starting with a criticism of our newscasters….
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black !
WJAR 10 wouldn’t recognize impartial journalism if they tripped over it !! The sarcasm in the way you and your fellow reporters present news about the state budget crisis (always implying that state employees, teachers, and the poor are to blame for all the ills of the state) is so obvious it would be laughable except people take what you say at face value. Methinks your conservative slip is showing, Mr Rappleye. The only journalist on your station who reported the news without inserting their personal political bias was the late Doug White.
If you don’t like what Chris Matthews has to say, why don’t you change the channel to Fox, the home of ‘balanced journalism’ and watch Bill O’Rielly?
Dora A
No. Do Fox News folks’ biases disqualify them? I like Chris Mathews because he’s honest. I don’t always agree with him, but at least I clearly understand what he’s thinking. That’s the whole premise behind the show, after all.
Kalula
Chris Matthews should be fired….
I am disgusted! This country has been hi-jacked by the left wing. Remember when journalists and the news media actually reported unbiased facts? Now everyone has an agenda. “make this presidency work”? Is he kidding me? I am so sick of the double standard.
Anakin
As I had “rapped” about previously, the liberal media has indeed gone
> too far. It has become evident that President-elect Obama not only
> had the advantage of a treasure-trove of cash from Hollywood and other
> business leaders, but also the blatant support of many journalists,
> Chris Matthews included. While I think it’s clear he’s not objective,
> demanding his resignation would beg the question should half the media
> resign as many others, including Gwen Ifil (debate moderator) clearly
> favored Obama during the campaign. Last night Lester Holt made it
> clear during the evening news that “while this economic crisis did not
> happen on his watch, President-elect Obama will attempt to address
> this problem”. I rest my case!
> Mary Beth, Swansea
Matthews best failed to hold the Bush presidency “accountable”
He’s paid by Wall Street sponsored media to Cheerlead in upturns, downplay the risks and hide the truth.
It’s business as usual. The subterfuge of the electoral process itself, by candidates who know full well that, once in office, their polices will be determined not by election promises but by the demands of the ruling elite and the exigencies of securing the world market for wall street with working class children.
Americans had to hold the Republicans accountable for their crimes against the Constitution and human rights, for their violations of US and international laws, for their lies and deceptions, for their financial chicanery, for acts of war on multiple nations and appalled the world with concentration camps, torture, mass murder and utter disrespect for international law and the world community.
Unfortunately Obama’s actions since Election Day have been calculated to signal to the ruling elite his readiness to defend their interests and not be swayed by the will of the electorate. Hi’s advisers are drawn from the same gang of Washington thugs and Wall Street bankers. Unlimited taxpayer funds available for the banks, but no money to address the increasingly desperate economic situation facing the working stiff.
Obama’s been on the phone about economic matters with foreign leaders of - England, Canada, Australia, France, Germany, Israel, Japan, Mexico, and South Korea.
What of Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, India, South Asia, South America, Africa, etc.
Looks like WW3 is brewing between a US-UK dominated speculative derivative monetized scheme -live forever in debt die before you pay - bloc and a
Russia-China-India- Middle Eastern anti-derivatives, resource and production based economy.
The Wall Street derivatives merchants and war profiteers win. Graft, usury and the money lenders stay in the Temple.
Zuke
Mr Matthews has to make a decision. Does he want to be a
News Reporter? or a
News Commentator?
If the latter, I suspect a spot awaits him on the Comedy Channel
Peter in Providence
Send Chris back to politics….He loves to talk, and is always butting in after he asks a question, with his own comments. It was never hard, during the primaries, to see where his agliaince lay.
Charlie
Chris Matthews should NOT be a news commentator - because his BIAS is promoting a candidate and that is a free unpaid advertising and an endorsement not news worthy or informative or most of all democratic. Joyce
He does a far better job than you, dear…
kalula
Chris Mathews AND the whole crew of fox news ought to be
gone!!!!
I am a news junkie. I had to shut the tv off tonight because mathews is way far over the top on several subjects tonight.
He needs to be gone.
Judith
Chris Mathews should be ashamed of calling himself a journalist. he is a left wing collaborator and if that’s what he wants to be, he should join the DNC and stay there. A journalist should be objective, not partisan, and Mathews is far from being objective. He is not alone, The likes of Leno, Winfrey and sorry to say Degeneros are no different. I realize that they have talk shows, but to use their forum to promote one party over another is disgraceful. They, the latter three do it in such a way as to slowly de-senstise the audience so we are not aware of what is happening, I however was not de-sensitized.
Al, Johnston
Of course, Chris Matthews should keep his job. For years we have been subjected to “fair & impartial” comments by the commentators at Fox News plus the likes of Rush Limbaugh who trash any politicians who don’t agree with their right wing agenda. Now after the recent election results, we have a counterpoint in Chris Matthews. It’s about time!
Bob, East Greenwich
When it comes to journalism, this person isn’t a journalist he is
transparently and grotesquely biased - we see that every day, along with MSNBC: Mika Brezhinski (obviously the dumbest human being ever to appear on television, including animal stories), Chris Matthews and the undisputed king of cable TV whackos, Keith Olberwellian have long-abandoned any pretense of objectivity, professional bearing, fairness and, with it, Journalism.
He is mad - mad with media power No, I mean stark, raving mad. I mean when like watching a car wreck. Like you can’t believe what you’ve just seen.
Such was the case back in August (Friday Aug 29 as I know longer support MSNBC and very rarely do I support NBC, there is only 1 exception and that is channel 10 news morning noon and night you guys are the only local news I will watch) when on MSNBC Chris Matthews gave Olberman a real run for the Joe McCarthy/Howard Beal award by becoming literally apoplectic at the news of Sarah Palin.
Viewers must earnestly have thought Matthews was almost surely suffering a stroke: his eyes were popping out of his fat head, his face was not just red but impurpled, spittle was forming in the corners of his mouth, and there wasn’t a trace of irony or humor in his vindictive tirade.
I mean, I know Matthews has just said “to hell with my critics” (for admitting to his being totally in the bag for Obama)...but Chris Matthews acted like a crazy man.
And I believe within my heart its people like him and Oberman that got the democrats in office
the republicans didn’t get fair air time at all ..
Then it got worse (i.e. Really Good).
After wildly screeching his objections to Sarah Palin’s resume, John McCain’s nefarious motives and the general evilness of Republicans, Matthews spewed at his GUEST AND COLLEAGUE (and a man superior to Matthews in terms of intellect, expertise, political knowledge and, now obviously, breeding) Pat Buchanan the single most ugly, personal, insulting attack on another person I have ever witnessed on television. (And I am a veteran TV talking head, having made hundreds of appearances with friend and mostly foe, mostly on MSNBC.)
The thesis, as it were, of Matthews’ rant was “how is it POSSIBLE someone could be even CONSIDERED for high office if she had once SUPPORTED PAT BUCHANAN?!“ (Full disclosure: I workred for Pat Buchanan off and on for years, including his Presidential campaigns.)
Matthews, glowering at an incredulous Buchanan - who could clearly see the host had vacated his faculties - said “YOU MEAN SARAH PALIN COULD BE PICKED EVEN AFTER SUPPORTING THE WORST OF PAT BUCHANAN?!“ (A reference to PB’s controversial and magnificent convention speech.) This to Mr. Buchanan’s face - again, a day-to-day MSNBC colleague, respected author, political figure and former candidate for President of the United States.
Matthews’ seizure continued for the entirety of the show. When at the end Pat Buchanan asserted that Sarah Palin’s pro-life postion would be a political asset in many areas of the country (this issue and statement seeming to drive Matthews to a glorious new level of screaming, wild-eyed, foaming madness) the host responded like a troubled child “OH YEAH?! YOU JUST GO AND TRY THAT UP WHERE I LIVE AND SEE WHERE IT GETS YOU!“
Maybe poor Chris - whom I’ve met, and whose work I once admired - simply cannot withstand the mental strain of being dominated and punched around like a skinny cousin on-air by the paranoid bully Olberman.
But let the record show - and the timeless video prove - that on Friday night, August 29, 7-8 p.m., with his hideously inappropriate and ugly personal attack on a colleague, Chris Matthews achieved the truly impressive: he sunk to the lowest level of any host in cable television history.
Perfect for who Chris Matthews - and MSBNC - has become.
Brenda Lee