Union agrees to present deal to members
Union To Present Deal To Members
Council 94 decides to let its workers vote on a deal that would avert a state shutdown.
NBC 10
J. Michael Downey, president of Council 94.
Published: September 25, 2009
Updated: September 25, 2009
NORTH PROVIDENCE, R.I.—The largest state employees union in Rhode Island decided Friday to let its workers vote on tentative deal that would result in lost pay but protect them from losing their jobs, a decision that could end an impasse with Gov. Don Carcieri, union officials said.
An agreement with Council 94 was critical to Carcieri’s cost-cutting plan to help close a $68 million budget shortfall since it’s the largest union and others in state government tend to follow its lead. On Wednesday, leaders of Council 94 rejected an initial deal with Carcieri in the hopes they could negotiate something better.
“The governor said there’s two chances of that happening: slim to none,“ Council 94 President J. Michael Downey said, explaining why the union reversed course.
After suffering a rejection Wednesday, Carcieri announced he was done negotiating and would lay off workers in any union that did not ratify the agreement by Oct. 2. Carcieri sent his executive director of human resources, Stephen Johnston, to answer questions Friday from union leaders during a closed-door meeting.
“I am pleased that the presidents of Council 94 have made the decision to allow their members a chance to vote on this agreement,“ Carcieri said in a written statement. “It is my goal to keep people working, and this agreement will give state employees job security.“
Last month, Carcieri ordered a shutdown of state government for a dozen days to help close a looming budget deficit brought on by one of the state’s worst recessions in decades.
A collection of 10 state employee unions sued to block the shutdown plan. When the state Supreme Court temporarily halted Carcieri from implementing the shutdown, the governor said the ruling left him no other option but to lay off 1,000 state workers.
After negotiations, union leaders reached a deal that would require workers to lose 12 days of pay in the next two years and delay a scheduled 3 percent pay raise. They would receive extra vacation time and could reclaim some of that lost pay when they retire or leave their state jobs.
In return, Carcieri would promise not to shut down state government and would abandon his layoff plan.
But the deal threatened to fall apart after Carcieri sought the ability to reassign workers to different jobs and offices, a proposal that prompted Council 94 to balk at the voting on the agreement Wednesday.
Carcieri has said that he needs the flexibility to reorganize and consolidate state government as a dismal economy drives down the state’s tax income. Union leaders fear that workers could be subject to random job transfers and suffer a loss in job security.
Two other unions have already ratified the deal, while Council 94 and six additional unions are planning to vote on it.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Oh, how magnanimous of the union to let their members decide—NOW THAT THEY HAVE APPROVED THE CONCESSIONS. Don’t get me wrong—but WASN’T IT SUPPOSED TO BE THE MEMBERS DECISION IN THE FIRST PLACE???
Unions—especially this one—have outlived their usefulness. GET RID OF THE UNIONS, AND WE’LL ALL BE BETTER OFF!
I wish that “we the people” could vote the unions out completely. They seem to try to run the government. I am glad D.C. did not give in like most politions would. Unions had their place once upon a time but not any more-especially in govt.I think some of the financial problems of RI are the unions. They have sucked the $ right out of the govt.with pensions that are no longer realistic, mega vacation, “personal days” (in my company you use vacation days for personal time)Also, what’s the big deal that you might get moved around? I had a really good job with people working under me.Now,they have been layed off and I do their jobs.Things I never thought I would do.But I have a job.If I told my boss I did not want to do it, he would say “Bye-Bye!
i think that our wonderful governor, and his cronies, should give up their mega-salaries, instead of going after the real workers. the union rep for 94 needs to get a grip, too…making all of these decisions without the vote of the people of the union. this state is a total disaster, thanks, don, in each and every way. today’s news reported that our 12 year olds are drinking at a much higher percentage than 12 year olds in other states. we have so many issues here that he needs to address. we didn’t screw up the budget, he did. can’t wait till he’s out of office… i have written to him many, many, many times. never received a direct response, only from his cronies. and, they were unacceptable responses, by the way. good luck to all in 94… i wish you well
unions were good years ago, but like anything else a few regulated the majority. it is a shame, but we are all going through this…everybody is, so if we all give a little things could get better sooner. some of us have given a lot…buit what choice do we have??
Seeing as they will be all together, they should also vote to replace the union leaders.
I feel sorry for the people of Council 94…to have morons like this in control of their future….Sad! Council 94 President J. Michael Downey has definitely shown why Unions are a waste of money…..Maybe the members will wake up and vote the union out
For some reason every time I see this union leader I think of former Ohio US Rep James Traficant. Swear they could be brothers
newman39: Appreciate your support. It’s very difficult in this day and age to voice your opinion as a state worker and not get lambasted. I realize the daunting situation the state is in. With that said, of course I am looking out for my well-being, but fair is fair. The union is completely out of line in this particular situation and the big vote from the rank and file will reflect this….
You are obviously a union member and not one of the union thugs or a small percentage of union members that give the workers a bad name. Vote them out next time and demand that all contracts and changes be brought to the members for a vote. Good luck to you personally. From—not a union member; but employed and pay 33% for health and have taken a 45% paycut for the same amount of hours worked.
I’d rather have the original plan of 12 furlough days…..is this now off the table??? Hope not. Thanks union heads….for nothing!!!














Advertisement