Wind power a factor in sea plan for East Coast
Associated Press Writer
Published: September 24, 2009
Updated: September 24, 2009
PROVIDENCE—The Obama administration must juggle competing interests surrounding offshore wind farms proposed for the East Coast as it decides how the nation’s ocean waters can be used, officials said Thursday.
Wind power was among several concerns Obama’s Ocean Policy Task Force heard during a public meeting in Providence, its only stop on the wind-rich East Coast. The meeting came a week after the task force recommended creating a National Ocean Council to coordinate and hold accountable a hodgepodge of federal agencies responsible for conservation and marine planning.
The task force’s next job is figuring out what uses the country should allow in its waters and where. Three states - Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Maine - are already creating their own management
plans, in part to decide where offshore wind turbines could be placed.
“Offshore of the northeastern states is the most wind-rich area of the country,“ said Melville Cote Jr., manager of the ocean and coastal protection unit of the New England region of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Speakers who addressed the task force repeatedly asked the group to keep local concerns in mind when considering ocean uses.
No offshore wind farms have been constructed in the United States, but projects have been proposed in waters off states including Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Delaware and New Jersey.
Peter Mandelstam, president of Bluewater Wind LLC, said wind projects that are in development should be allowed to proceed while the task force simultaneously works out its rules for the use of
coastal and ocean waters.
The eastern market offers natural advantages for the wind power industry, including a long, shallow coastal shelf that makes building wind turbines cheaper and easier than in deeper waters, said Mandelstam, who serves as chairman of the American Wind Energy Association’s Offshore Wind Working Group.
Those wind turbines would also serve a market that already faces some of the highest electricity prices in the country because of its reliance on fossil fuels.
When setting rules on wind turbines, the task force should also consider the needs of passenger vessels, said Beth Gedney, director of safety, security and risk management for the Passenger Vessel
Association. Gedney said more attention should have been paid to the needs of ferries shuttling passengers to Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket as regulators considered a plan to build 130 turbines in
Nantucket Sound in Massachusetts.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Wind farm??? Give me a break, do you know how many wind mills you have to erect to come close to a Fossel Fuel generating station. Why not concentrate on three things to get energy independent:
1. Drill here drill now offshore and in Alaska.
2. More natural gas.
3. Nuclear energy
Wind and Solar are way off why not fill the gap during development with resources available now. Just imagine all the jobs you can generate by drilling and refining oil, building nuclear plants and drilling for natural gas. How is that hope and change working for you?
Snatcher you gave me a McEnroe moment… “You can’t be serious”!
It’s a shame that these wind farms haven’t been built already. There are so many renewable resources that simply haven’t even begun to be utilized. With hundreds of miles of coastline, I’m sure it wouldn’t be a problem either to leave a mile or two of space open for ferries and ships to pass through.
Just how much electricity are you going to generate with wind? Its proably the most unpredictable power source available and cost a fortune to build a windmill. Why dont we concentrate on oil in Alaska and off shore and natural gas at least to gain our independence from foreign sources. Then we can look at alternatives like nucleur energy which we know works. Drill here Drill now!!!













Advertisement