Mass. lawmakers approve Kennedy interim bill
AP Political Writer
Published: September 23, 2009
BOSTON - The Massachusetts Legislature on Wednesday gave final approval to a bill allowing the governor to replace the late U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy temporarily, moving a step closer to restoring a critical 60th U.S. Senate vote President Barack Obama needs to pass his health care overhaul this year.
The state House voted 95-59, and the state Senate 24-16, just moments after a separate House vote in which lawmakers declined to make the law go into effect immediately.
That means Gov. Deval Patrick must send a letter to the secretary of state declaring an emergency if he wants an interim replacement right away. Otherwise, he must wait 90 days, leaving a vacancy for most of the five-month special election campaign now under way to fill the seat permanently.
House Republicans accused Patrick and his fellow Democrats of a power grab. Democrats defeated GOP efforts to allow an interim appointment in 2004 and 2006, while a Republican, then-Gov. Mitt Romney, was in power.
The vote Wednesday against the emergency preamble included numerous Democrats. There are only 16 Republicans in the 160-member chamber and five in the 40-member Senate, and some Democratic opponents joined the GOP in complaining their party was changing the law merely to ensure Obama regained a filibuster-proof margin in the Senate.
“This is not an emergency,“ said state Rep. Paul Frost, R-Auburn. “So however the governor is going to write a letter to the secretary of state, saying the Legislature didn’t agree it was an emergency, but I do, I can’t wait to see it.“
Meanwhile, a family confidant said that Kennedy’s two sons, Edward Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., had placed separate calls to Patrick, urging him to appoint former Democratic National Committee chairman Paul G. Kirk Jr. to replace their father.
A top Patrick aide confirmed the contacts but said no decision had been made. A spokeswoman in Patrick Kennedy’s congressional office declined to comment.
Patrick could announce his pick as early as Thursday, assuming no further constitutional challenges. He was returning to Boston Wednesday evening from his vacation home in the Berkshire Mountains, where he has been recovering from hip replacement surgery for the past three weeks. Aides said he planned to meet with fired Hyatt hotel workers he is trying to get reinstated. They would not say if he had any announcements planned.
The 71-year-old Kirk, a Boston attorney, was close friends with the senator. He and his wife, Gail, live on Cape Cod, and he was among the few regular visitors allowed at Kennedy’s Hyannis Port home before he died there of brain cancer on Aug. 25.
Kirk also knows the senator’s staff intimately and would likely be assured of their loyalty given his relationship with Kennedy.
As a senior statesman who has never served in political office, he would pose no threat to any of the candidates competing in the special election. The Democratic field includes state Attorney General Martha Coakley, vying to be the state’s first female senator, and U.S. Rep. Michael Capuano, the lone member of the state’s congressional delegation in the race.
The family confidant, who like the Patrick aide demanded anonymity to speak about private conversations, refused to reveal whether the senator’s widow, Vicki, had also endorsed Kirk. Vicki Kennedy has granted no interviews since her husband’s death, but Patrick revealed recently that she had told him she did not want to be considered for the interim appointment.
Kirk graduated from Harvard College and Harvard Law School and served on Kennedy’s staff between 1969 and 1977. He ran the Democratic National Committee in the run-up to former Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis’ unsuccessful run for president in 1988.
Kirk also co-founded the Commission on Presidential Debates, which has sponsored every presidential and vice presidential debate involving major candidates since 1988.
He now serves as chairman of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation. He was in the national spotlight last month when he hosted a memorial service the evening before Kennedy’s funeral.
Kirk also is exceptionally close to Caroline Kennedy, who serves as president of the library foundation honoring her late father. He stood on the stage with her and the late senator each year as they dispensed the library’s annual “Profiles in Courage” awards.
Asked recently whether he would be interested in an interim appointment, Kirk told The Associated Press in an e-mail, “It would be much too presumptuous of me to even consider. Hope you will understand.“
Dukakis is among those who is said to be under consideration. He, too, has declined to comment on the question.
Associated Press Writer Jay Lindsay contributed to this report.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Smitty ) on September 24, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Yeah—as I said, If there is one thing we don’t need it is a proclaimed self serving status seeker as our representative in the US Senate.
Oh yeah,Smitty…we don’t have ANY of those in Congress!!
Yeah—as I said, If there is one thing we don’t need it is a proclaimed self serving status seeker as our representative in the US Senate.
It’s bad enough that we have two-faced representatives who say they’re working for the people while the people know darn well they’re working for themselves!
The Kennedys re-write legislation yet again. I find it not only disheartening, but disturbing that the law is re-written at the convenience of the democratic (or republican) party. In other words, in the Kennedy world, it’s “do as I say, not as I do.“ Politics stink, yet we keep voting these losers in.
It has to be pointed out here that Mr. Romney ran for governor of Massachusetts strictly as a stepping stone to advance his political ambitions. He also started monkeying around with the state finances and changed quite a few things to suit himself. Is it any wonder why the legislature didn’t want him appointing a replacement for Mr. Kerry if Mr. Kerry would have been elected president?
You KNOW what would have happened then—he would have resigned (like he did anyway) and then have his replacement appoint HIM to the senate. If there is one thing we don’t need it is a proclaimed self serving status seeker as our representative in the US Senate. Mr. Kennedy, for all his faults, listened to the people of this state. Mr. Romney would not have listened—to ANYBODY!
Now—on THAT one corgvette—I HAVE TO AGREE—WHOLEHEARTEDLY!! ![]()
I understand that MA is democratic but it should be up to the voters not the convenience of the democratic party. This is typical dirty polotics and its a shame the voters dont recognise it for what it is. Shame on the politicians there all a bunch of crooks democrat and republican.
The state is solidly democratic. If you think a republican has a chance to get voted into the senate, you’re only kidding yourself. I don’t think this should have been done—especially in the way it was done, but the new ELECTED senator would most likely be a democrat, so why shouldn’t the temporary replacement be a democrat as well?
Yes its sad that the fairness went out the window when its possible a republican could get the senate seat. They change the law to accomodate Teddy when Kerry’s seat could be lost because the Govenor is a repiblican and if Kerry had won the presidency he would have chosen a republican. Now they change it back to a govenor appointment when they have a democratic govenor, now thats fair!! Lets change the laws to fit our needs, the heck with the voters.
It is sad that people are so unable to acknowledge simple fairness when politics is involved.
The people of Massachusetts are entitled to a representative in the U.S. Senate. There is no excuse for denying them that representation (are we halting taxation during this period?).
Moreover, they elected a Democrat, so the temporary replacement should be such. The resistance to appointment by a Republican governor in the previous situation is justified, because it would have allowed someone not in tune with the elected person to be appointed.
Paul Kirk seems entirely appropriate in this context, being a close associate of the Senator chosen by the people of MA.
What a surprise!! The democrats in MA make the laws to fit their situation. The voters in MA better smarten up or they will continue to see this type of manipulation going on. What a great state, Barney Frank, gary Studds, Ted Kennedy, John (the war hero) Kerry and all the rest. I hear they may appoint Dukakis another loser.













Advertisement