Workplace deaths decline in New England

» 5 Comments | Post a Comment

BOSTON—A federal agency says 136 people died in New England from work-related injuries last year, 27 fewer than in the previous year and the lowest number since it began compiling the statistics in 1992.

The 2008 preliminary figures were released Thursday by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The two New England states with the largest workforces - Massachusetts and Connecticut - accounted for two-thirds of the region’s occupational deaths in 2008.

Sixty-one workers died in Massachusetts, 14 fewer than in 2007. Transportation accidents accounted for 30 percent of fatalities, while falls were the second-leading cause of death at 25 percent.

Connecticut recorded 28 worker deaths, down from 38 in the previous year.

There were 24 deaths in Maine, 10 in Vermont, seven in New Hampshire and six in Rhode Island.

Advertisement

 
View More: vermont,u.s. bureau of labor statistics,rhode island,new hampshire,massachusetts,maine,connecticut,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Smitty on November 20, 2009 at 6:25 am

Maybe it was a ‘workplace accident’ that this was thought to be of some importance, aka “newsworthy”.  Everyone is right—when jobs disappear, injuries go down!

Flag Comment Posted by loripb7563 on November 19, 2009 at 3:46 pm

u all beat me to it.  I was gonna say the same thing.  da no jobs!!!

Flag Comment Posted by tamlee1978 on November 19, 2009 at 3:37 pm

That wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact that the state’s unemployment rate is like 13% right.

Flag Comment Posted by Saltydog on November 19, 2009 at 2:04 pm

Thundergod:  You beat me to the punch on this one. Dahhh….hello….anyone home.  Unemployment goes up and workplace acidents go down.  That’s a real hard one to figure out.

Flag Comment Posted by Thundergod on November 19, 2009 at 1:44 pm

Wow this is amazing. Workplace deaths declined last year. I wonder if theres any correlation between the decline in deaths and the fact that unemployment, especially in the manufacturing area where most workplace accidents occur, is rampant in the Notheast? You need to actually have a job and be at work in order to die due to a “work” related injury. I be more curious as to just how much this agency spent researching this fact

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Hey Do This!

Advertisement

Advertisement